<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With or Without Recourse?  Clarifying the Endorsement When You Sell a Note</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notequeen.com/2008/06/12/with-or-without-recourse-clarifying-the-endorsement-when-you-sell-a-note/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notequeen.com/2008/06/12/with-or-without-recourse-clarifying-the-endorsement-when-you-sell-a-note/</link>
	<description>Owner financing help, title holding land trusts, owner will carry, benefits of seller financing, defer capital gains, what is my note worth, sell my note for cash, create a good note; Pasadena, Temple City, Alhambra, San Gabriel, Arcadia, Sierra Madre, El Monte, Rosemead, San Marino.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Rickabaugh</title>
		<link>http://notequeen.com/2008/06/12/with-or-without-recourse-clarifying-the-endorsement-when-you-sell-a-note/#comment-26879</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Rickabaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notequeen.com/2008/06/12/with-or-without-recourse-clarifying-the-endorsement-when-you-sell-a-note/#comment-26879</guid>
		<description>Hi Cary,

I&#039;m probably not qualified to talk about issues regarding bank policies.  As a general rule, my whole business model does not include dealing with banks on any level.

I do know I could sell a note but retain the servicing rights, so it&#039;s possible that&#039;s what happened in your situation.

My best,

Dawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cary,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably not qualified to talk about issues regarding bank policies.  As a general rule, my whole business model does not include dealing with banks on any level.</p>
<p>I do know I could sell a note but retain the servicing rights, so it&#8217;s possible that&#8217;s what happened in your situation.</p>
<p>My best,</p>
<p>Dawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://notequeen.com/2008/06/12/with-or-without-recourse-clarifying-the-endorsement-when-you-sell-a-note/#comment-26715</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 07:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notequeen.com/2008/06/12/with-or-without-recourse-clarifying-the-endorsement-when-you-sell-a-note/#comment-26715</guid>
		<description>I have a note endorsed without recourse from DOT bank 1 to bank 2. Then the note is endorsed again without recourse by Bank 2 to Bank 3. How can bank 2 now say Bank 3 is only the servicer and Bank 2 is the real party in interest? I haven&#039;t read where mortgage servicers get a note endorsed in blank without recourse from a lender and then only have servicing rights...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a note endorsed without recourse from DOT bank 1 to bank 2. Then the note is endorsed again without recourse by Bank 2 to Bank 3. How can bank 2 now say Bank 3 is only the servicer and Bank 2 is the real party in interest? I haven&#8217;t read where mortgage servicers get a note endorsed in blank without recourse from a lender and then only have servicing rights&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

